Saturday, February 23, 2013

The 2012 Analysis

It's time to take a look back at 2012 and try to figure out what what right, and what went wrong.

WARNING: There is some math/statistics that I don't bother to explain in this post.  Just trust me on it.

Overall, 2012 was not my strongest year.  My handicap index rose from the 5-range to 8.1, and I had a long stretch early in the season where my game was completely out of whack.  Having said that, I didn't always feel like I played that badly, but just that something was slightly amiss.

As usual, I prefer to look at some statistics to see if we can draw some conclusions.  Here is my 2012 data compared to my 5-year averages (2008-2012):


STATISTIC20125-YR AVG
Driving Accuracy
45.7%
44.1%
Misses Left
28.6%
29.9%
Misses Right
24.1%
23.1%
Driving Distance
271.2 yds
267.6 yds
Greens in Reg.
40.0%
39.4%
Putts/Hole
1.84
1.80
Par 3 Avg
3.82
3.67
Par 4 Avg
4.79
4.78
Par 5 Avg
5.67
5.54
Scrambling
17.6%
21.8%
Sand Saves
12.2%
21.5%
Adj. Shot Efficiency
0.717
0.732
Short Game
0.623
0.673
Avg. Round Index
11.6
10.4

The final number is, of course, the most important.  I was more than a full shot worse per round in 2012.  Let's see where that shot came from, starting from the tee box.

DRIVING
Looking at the driving statistics, it was a good year for me overall.  My driving accuracy was slightly better than my average, and my misses left were down -- noteworthy since the pull-hook is usually my trouble shot.  My average distance was up as well.  Anecdotally, I can say that there were rounds where my misses were so bad that they crushed my scoring opportunity, but obviously on the whole it wasn't trouble off the tee that was my major problem.

IRON PLAY
The most basic look at iron play is, of course, greens in regulation.  My 2012 number was essentially identical to my 5-year average there, so on first blush I'd say there were no major problems there.  However, my scoring on par-3's (which eliminates the effect of the driver on scoring) was significantly worse than my norm.  So maybe my iron play wasn't so great after all.  But that was nothing compared to...

SHORT GAME
It's quite clear from the numbers that this was the biggest area of weakness last year.  Both my scrambling percentage (pars made when missing the green in regulation) and sand save percentage were way down.  That was something that was quite evident during the bad stretch of play early-on, when it was not uncommon to see me take multiple shots to get out of bunkers.  This must be corrected in 2013.

PUTTING
As the saying goes, you drive for show, and putt for dough.  I exemplified that last year.  Although the raw numbers look pretty similar (only 0.04 putts/hole worse in 2012 than usual), statistically speaking it was my worst category -- about 1.5 standard deviations worse than normal.

So obviously the weakest area of my game was on and around the greens last year.  Looking at the other 2 summary statistics, though, it's clear that nothing was quite up to par.  My average adjusted shot efficiency (explained here) trended worse than average, though not statistically so (only 0.6 standard deviations below the 5-year average).  The "short game" number will be explained in a future post, but like shot efficiency it's a statistic I devised to approximate how effective all those around-the-green and putting strokes were in a given round; last year's number was a full 1.7 standard deviations worse than normal for me.  That's terrible.

One other interesting note from looking at these numbers -- by doing a regression analysis for each of the statistics in regards to the average round index for the year, it turns out that the single most predictive statistic for good scores for me is misses left; in the years where the percentage of my misses are more to the right than the left, I am notably more likely to score lower.  The R-squared value isn't high (only 0.43), but it's the highest of anything I have 5 years worth of data for (n.b. I only have data for 3-years worth of scrambling and sand save percentages).  Which brings me back to the driving section of this analysis -- where I noted that the pull-hook is usually my problem shot.  Eliminating that, and spending some quality time on the short game practice area will be my two focusses going into 2013.

The Best Courses | The Membership

I know, it's been a while.

Let's just pretend that's not the case.  We'll get to the 2012 analysis and what's to come for 2013 soon.

Moving on.... Golf Digest has a new iPhone app for rating golf courses based on their "proprietary formula" that is used to determine their "Best Courses" lists.  The app is pretty terrible, filled with bugs and generally less fun than one would hope.

BUT (of course), I've been using that "proprietary formula" for a few years to rate the courses that I have played.  And after last summer's Scotland trip, I've got enough good ones in the database to put out a list of the 10 Best.

First, here are the categories Golf Digest uses (quoted from their website):

1. Shot Values
How well does the course pose risks and rewards and equally test length, accuracy and finesse?
2. Resistance to Scoring
How difficult, while still being fair, is the course for a scratch player from the back tees?
3. Design Variety
How varied are the golf course's holes in differing lengths, configurations, hazard placements, green shapes and green contours?
4. Memorability
How well do the design features (tees, fairways, greens, hazards, vegetation and terrain) provide individuality to each hole, yet a collective continuity to the entire 18?
5. Aesthetics
How well do the scenic values of the course (including landscaping, vegetation, water features and backdrops) add to the pleasure of a round?
6. Conditioning
How firm, fast and rolling were the fairways, and how firm yet receptive were the greens on the day you played the course?
7. Ambience
How well does the overall feel and atmosphere of the course reflect or uphold the traditional values of the game?
Read More http://www.golfdigest.com/golf-courses/2011-05/100-greatest-golf-courses-methodology#ixzz2Lh4BmpZh

Each category is given a score from 1-10, with 10 being absolutely perfect (in other words, grade tough).  Category #1 (which I interpret as "how fun/awesome is it to play the course") is counted twice, so the maximum score is 80.

With that in mind, here's my list, with the scores I'd assign them:

1. Turnberry Resort (Ailsa Course), Ayrshire, Scotland - 73.4 points.
2. St. Andrews Links (Old Course), St. Andrews, Scotland - 69.8 points.
3. Bethpage State Park (Black), Farmingdale, NY - 65.8 points.
4. TPC Boston, Norton, MA - 64 points.
5. Links at Lighthouse Sound, Bishopville, MD - 63 points.
6. Ballyowen, Hardyston, NJ - 62.7 points.
    Granite Links Golf Club (Milton-Quincy), Quincy, MA - 62.7 points.
8. The International (Oaks), Bolton, MA - 61.8 points.
9. Brae Burn C.C., Newton, MA - 61.6 points.
10. Turning Stone Resort (Atunyote), Verona, NY - 60.5 points.
      Red Tail Golf Course, Devens, MA - 60.5 points.

Honorable mentions: the other 2 courses at Turning Stone (Shenendoah 60 points; Kaluhyat 59.2 points), and Newport National in Middletown, RI (59.9 points).

My category leaders are:
Shot Values - St. Andrews (9.2)
Resistance to Scoring - Bethpage Black (10)
Design Variety - Turnberry (8.5)
Memorability - St. Andrews (10)
Aesthetics - Turnberry (9.9)
Conditioning - Turnberry (9.5)
Ambience - St. Andrews (10)

I look at that list and feel very fortunate.  4 of the courses have hosted major championships (Turnberry, St. Andrews, Bethpage, Brae Burn), 2 others have been the host to PGA Tour events (TPC Boston and Atunyote), and one was the site of a US Women's Public Links Championship (Red Tail).

The others?  Lighthouse Sound has been called the "Pebble Beach of the east" -- probably a stretch, but still gives you some clue to the natural beauty that surrounds it.  Ballyowen is a spectacular track, probably my favorite (US) course on the list.  The Oaks course at The International is the sister course to the multi-record-holding Pines course on the same property (longest hole, largest tee box, largest green).  And Granite Links is my new home.

Yes, that's right, I'm now a member of a club.

I'm not sure what that means for The Mission.  But I know I'm looking forward to playing a lot of rounds on the same course this year.  I know I now have access to a practice facility with a range, short game area, and multiple putting greens, and I can only hope that with that kind of practice that even par is not far away.